Saturday, June 7, 2025

Superhombre

A few months ago Friend o'the Archive Jason Rhodes sent along some intriguing scans from a Mexican licensed set of comics that feature images taken from the 1966 Superman In The Jungle release. SITJ is one of the more legendary U.S. test issues unleashed by Topps, fueled by both the superhero connection and extreme scarcity. The PSA registry count is quite low, with 120 total subjects graded, of which 110 are proofs, and where I assume the latter are all blank-backed.  It's not quite as bad as those figures indicate as a number of off-register and/or hand crudely hand cut "finished" examples have survived that don't really merit being slabbed, but the rarity of these is up there. 

Here is the U.S. version, in the aforementioned hand cut shape.


The reverse features a well done design IMO:

The set saw a full UK retail release, seemingly in 1968, licensed by A&BC, which is easily found and well-known to collectors. However, as it turns out a Mexican set, shrunk down to comic size - and presumably minus some subjects - was also issued by Topps of Mexico. The wrapper is fantastic:


These were Bazooka penny tab-sized but they are quite a departure from Bazooka Joe, no?

Here's an A&BC card (no. 17) titled "Escape By X-Ray":


You can see the A&BC indicia has replaced that of T.C.G. but other than that and some color variance, the backs are the same as the US test version (the back illustrations change around card-by-card in both sets):

And here is the corresponding comic strip from Mexico:

It lacks the vivid colors of the card set but for a wax comic it looks pretty sweet.  The translation of the bottom text, according to Google, reads "The man of steel had an idea, he used a burst of x-rays and the beast escaped scared." Did you know that "panther" in Spanish is "pantera"? Well, it was news to the folks as Para Topps Mexico!

Here's a couple more for your viewing pleasure, nos. 20 and 32, respectively:


Jason unearthed fourteen subjects: 2,5,7,8,15,16,17,20,30,31,32,33,39,40. 

The Bazooka one cent comic set counts from 1966-68 were 42 (14x3) in all years. I'm not sure that it's safe to assume a similar number of subjects here but the known SITJ comics count suggests the possibility. 

Saturday, May 31, 2025

Distress Call

We have a bit of a mystery today folks, and an unprecedented one at that. Over the years, all sorts of strange and wonderful things have come into my mailboxes thanks to this blog. Some turn out to be nothing, while others offer something new and unknown.  Today it's time to look at a weird offshoot of the 1968 Baseball Game, one I'm really scratching my head over and presumed (presently at least) to originate at Topps around then.

Blank-backed copies of eighteen subjects have turned up, with fronts that lack any color other than black. Here is Gene Alley, in his black-and-white glory:


I've been able to examine this card in person and the beveled corners match up one hundred percent to the issued cards. Another (very) interesting thing is that what looks like a series of creases across Alley's face and in a couple of other spots are, in, fact, images of creases; it was designed to look distressed without actually being distressed.  There is some legitimate wear around the perimeter, not unexpected on an object with some age to it.

Here's the back:


The surface is pebbled, like old spiral flip-up notebook covers used to be. As such, it's difficult to determine how much of the reverse was also made to look distressed or if it's just picked up dirt over the years.

I mentioned eighteen subjects. They are:

Aaron
Alley
M. Alou
Cepeda
Fregosi
Howard
Killebrew
Lonborg
Mays
McCarver
Peters
B. Robinson
F. Robinson
Rose
Santo
Scott
Staub
Wynn

That's seven Hall-of-Famers plus one more player that could get in some day (Rose) and another from the roster of honored broadcasting nominees (McCarver). Presently, it's not clear if the remaining fifteen subjects were contemplated, or even exist.

EDIT 6/10/25: It now seems all examples have only retained the head portion, and not the shoulders, for each subject: 



So, any thoughts out there? I'm really not sure what to make of all this, it's just so strange. I am sure these would appeal to just about any variety of player, team, oddball, or Hall-of-Fame collector and understand many or possibly all of these will be offered for sale soon (not by me). Maybe some of the new owners will be able to discern additional clues. 

Saturday, May 24, 2025

Change Of Paice

We have a treat today, a guest post from Keith Olbermann looking at some mysterious doings within the 1962-63 Topps Hockey set:

The 1962-63 Topps Hockey Mystery: Doug Marcel Frank Harvey Paille Paice

I’m pretty sure there are three unissued error cards that Topps printed, then withdrew, from its 1962-63 hockey set. Whether any of them ever got out in packs, I can’t say. But based on the Topps production methods so meticulously obsessed over by your proprietor here, I’m pretty sure they could  have.

#3 Bruce Gamble (photo of Doug Mohns), #6 Doug Mohns (photo of Bruce Gamble), and especially #61 Marcel Paille (with goalie Paille’s name on the front, Paille’s biography on the back, with a photo of not Paille but rather Rangers’ trainer Frank Paice) have been categorized – dismissed, even – as proofs that were corrected before the set was printed.

(ed. note - Here's the Gamble and Mohns cards, as issued):


 

I don’t think so. And why  I don’t think so requires a lot of back story.

I first bumped into this small-scale mystery as an unknowing but curious 10 year old, after my folks bought me the ’62-63 hockey set as a Christmas present. That era’s Topps cards showed only players from the Bruins, Black Hawks, and Rangers (the Canadian teams and Detroit belonged to Parkhurst) and it quickly struck me that there was something wrong with the Topps personnel selections for the New York team. The cards were numbered by team and, within each team, position. The Bruins (1-22) and Black Hawks (23-44) started with the coach, then two goalies, then the defensemen, then the forwards, then the team picture. But the Rangers (45-65) had no coach, one goalie, and incongruously – Frank Paice, the team’s trainer when the cards originally came out, and still the trainer when I obtained them in 1969, and still the trainer when I came home for Easter break as a sophomore in college.

Pick any juncture and it never made sense. No card of the coach? One goalie? The trainer? Who the hell wants a card of the trainer? My focus as a kid was the coach part. Future Hall of Famer Doug Harvey had come in from Montreal to become the Rangers’ player-coach (the NHL’s last to make it through a full season, by the way) and frankly, he killed it. He led the team to the playoffs for the first time in four years, made first-team All-Star, and won the Norris Trophy as the top defenseman (for the seventh time in eight seasons). If there had been an award for top coach he would’ve won that, too. He had a three-year deal at $25,000 per to play and coach for the team and observers figured that by succeeding in his first year, he had cleared the highest hurdle with flying colors. If anything were going  to change for the 1962-63 season, it was assumed (Harvey even hinted) that approaching his 38th birthday, he’d retire as a player and just coach the team. Some of Harvey’s old Canadiens teammates thought Harvey might even wind up as Coach and General Manager and player. 

On June 4th Harvey quit as coach.

Days later he said he also wouldn’t return to the Rangers as just a player and was retiring from hockey.

The Rangers kept both the coaching job and Harvey’s roster spot open until August 22 when they talked him back – as a player only – for a then-record salary of $30,000. On August 30 they announced that General Manager Muzz Patrick (who had just given Harvey a $5,000 raise for a lot less work) would coach the team with the assistance of former goalie Emile Francis. The smart money was on Patrick spending an undetermined period of time trying to talk Harvey into becoming coach again  and if he failed, to officially make Francis the coach.

On December 28th, Muzz Patrick gave up, resigned as coach, and named as his own successor… George “Red” Sullivan.

Needless to say this screwed up Topps’ hockey card preparations. The deadline to finalize the set looks to have been around mid-September and we can conclude this by the fact that Topps didn’t touch Harvey with a ten-foot pole, but it did make a card of veteran Bert Olmstead, who had been obtained by New York in a summer draft. Olmstead retired from hockey on September 20 – but he’s still in the set. Topps didn’t know if Doug Harvey would be player-coach, or just coach, or just player, or none of the above. As if more uncertainty was needed, he broke a knuckle in early September diagramming a football play on a blackboard. It looked  like he would be in the Rangers’ Opening Night roster, but given his reputation for being erratic, nobody could know for sure (later, his “reputation” turned out to be one part bipolarity and one part self-medicating it with alcohol). It looked  like Muzz Patrick was the coach, but would that still be the case when the cards came out? It looked  like Emile Francis would eventually be the coach – but when? (turned out: after Sullivan washed out – in 1966). But the DefCon 1 level confusion still wouldn’t explain why they’d decide to make a card of the trainer instead of a coach – any coach. Yet there he was, #61 Frank Paice. And by the way there was no card of any kind of Doug Harvey in the Topps set.

This only bothered me for the next fifteen years.

In early 1985 I wrote a couple of pieces on Topps proofs for Krause’s Baseball Cards  Magazine, mostly to pass the time as I waited to move to Los Angeles to take up a job as the sports director and sportscaster on Channel 5 there (hey, I was a kinda player-coach too!) Just weeks before my move at the end of August I was contacted by a man in New London, Connecticut, who said he and his friend had been remodeling the friend’s rec room and in the ceiling they had discovered a lot (a lot – as in hundreds) of what he believed were Topps Proof sheets, and the same day saw the magazine with my article at a newsstand somewhere. Could I come up and evaluate things for them? Which is how I happened upon the greatest find of proof sheets ever, not counting the Topps Guernsey Auction four years later. And of course I happened upon it when I hadn’t worked in literally ten months and was going to have to borrow the money from my kid sister for the bus to JFK Airport to get to L.A. for my new job.

What these men had found was, simply, all but approximately one of all the 1962 Topps Baseball, Football, and Hockey uncut sheets, and aluminum printing plates, that you’ve ever seen, or seen for sale, in the last forty years. They literally fell out of the guy’s ceiling. Those Topps NFL proofs with the wrong player’s photo on card after card? They were in there. The baseball All-Stars without positions? The photos from the second series of the ’59 set – including Koufax - printed without borders or names or anything? The ’62 Topps Don Zimmer with the Mets, not the Reds. All of them. Full color sheets. One-color sheets. Two-color sheets. Three-color sheets. Fronts. Backs. How? How? How?  “I remember now, the guy I bought the house from, he used to work at the printer’s in town, he told me this room had extra insulation.” Even though a lot of the aluminum had rusted and in some cases that had stained the sheets, I estimated what they had might be worth six figures. They thanked me by letting me buy one sheet of my choice at way below value. I took the baseball sheet with the most variations from the issued cards (the All-Stars without positions including Mantle, and the Zimmer-Mets ID, and a few others) and they only took my last $200. Even with that I had to cut the sheet up to split the cost with a fellow proof collector with a similar microscopic bank account.

My second choice just happened to be the 1962-63 Topps Hockey proof sheet that explained it all. Besides the quaint switch of the photos of Bruins players Gamble and Mohns, there he was, top row, third from the right: the Rangers’ hand-out photo of trainer Frank Paice faintly smiling up at me. Except, the card didn’t identify him as Frank Paice. It called him “Marcel Paille” and labeled him not as a trainer but as a goalie. In an instant, it sort of made sense. They hadn’t chosen to skip the coach card and put a trainer in instead. They had simply added a card of a second Rangers goalie, Paille. It might even have been the case that there was some original idea to make #61 a card of Doug Harvey because although that run of numbers is otherwise occupied by forwards, #61 fits into this alphabetical sequence: 59 Rod Gilbert, #60 Vic Hadfield, #61 Paille, #62 Camille Henry, #63 Bronco Horvath, #64 Pat Hannigan. MAYBE #61 was originally supposed to be Wayne Hall or Bryan Hextall Jr., rookies who didn’t make the Rangers out of training camp. Maybe it was supposed to be that Hannigan guy and somebody at Topps was really bad at alphabetizing. Maybe it was supposed to be Harvey.

(ed. note - Here's the 1962-63 Hockey aluminum plate, in front view):

But when the final decision was made, #61 became Marcel Paille, complete with the easiest possible mistake, especially in an alphabet-challenged office where preparing the Canadian hockey set was probably not high on the priority list: Frank Paice’s mislabeled picture.

Of special note: back in New London in the summer of 1985, the Paille proof front (with Paice’s photo) was blank-backed and the Paille proof back (complete with Paille’s biography) was blank-fronted. For years I kept an eye out for a 1962-63 Topps Marcel Paille card in any form, and was finally rewarded a few years ago when one of the aluminum printing plate versions I couldn’t have afforded to buy in a previous century, turned up. It was the back with the Paille bio. Then a full aluminum sheet turned up and I got that, too. And finally, months ago, a full 1962-63 Topps Hockey blank-backed proof sheet appeared in another auction. Complete with a little aluminum debris on the back, it is undoubtedly the same one I had gently patted goodbye – presumably forever - as I was escorted away by the finders, and off to the New London train station at the tender age of 26.

It was all revealed. At some point late in the summer of 1962, Topps gave up waiting for Doug Harvey to make up his mind. They pulled him out of the set, put back-up goalie Paille in, grabbed the photo of the wrong guy whose name started P-A-I, and caught the mistake so late in the publishing process that it was easier and cheaper to rewrite Paille’s name to Paice’s on the front and re-do the back altogether, than to get the correct photo of Paille.

That’s when the Topps Vault File Binder Page for 1962-63 Hockey, cards 61-63, turned up. If you’re unfamiliar with the Topps File Binders, they were a kind of accounting record of everything Topps issued. Two copies of each card in each set would be glued onto thick construction paper and kept in three-ring binders. One would go in face up, glue on the back. Next to it, back up, face on the front. With only three cards per page, needless to say there were so many Topps File Binders – a sort of “Proof Of Publication” archive – that they had their own room at the old Topps HQ on Whitehall Street. I was admitted, once. I was greatly covetous.

(ed. note - Here's some of the binders, as offered in the 1989 Topps-Guernsey's auction):


I don’t know how I missed it when they sold the Paille-Paice page in the first place, but there it was again in a recent auction: slabbed and complete with the historical evidence of the day they realized the mistake. Paille’s name is crossed off the front-facing card and “FRANK PAICE TRAINER’ written in, in grease pencil, on a piece of scotch tape, near his head. The back-facing card fared more poorly still at the archivist’s hand. The name has been crossed off and over the English bio is the word – in red – “WRONG” – and over the French bio, “PLAYER.” Between the cards, in ordinary pencil, written vertically, is the correct identification of Paice. The same vehement corrections have been made on the slabbed pages showing the Gamble-Mohns photo switch.

(ed. note - Here's the 1962-63 Hockey binder page, courtesy of Keith Olbermann):

So Paille/Paice is just a proof and that’s the end of it.

(ed. note - Here's the 1962-63 Hockey proof showing Paice, incorrectly labeled Paille, in front view, courtesy of Keith Olbermann):


Well, no, not really. As I said, I was in the File Binder room. I don’t know how many different binders I was shown, from how many different sports, but I can tell you this with certainty: they didn’t use proof cards in the File Binders that I inspected. They used issued cards. That was the point. These weren’t records of cards they intended  to sell but didn’t. These were the official, eternal files of all the cards they actually let loose into an unsuspecting world. Besides which, to make a File Binder out of proof cards you’d have to cut up proof sheets. This would take forever. And all the cards on these hockey binder sheets are meticulously and precisely cut, like they had been cut on a professional automated machine. There is also nothing of the tell-tale “glow” that has always accompanied Topps Proofs. They are shinier, clearer. They are first generation printings, not the later, fuzzier, flatter ones on the cards in the packs. But the cards in the File Binder page slabs look exactly like the issued 1962-63 Topps hockey cards, and don’t “glow” like proofs.

More over, if you hold the slabbed sheets up to strong light, you get the barest hint of what’s on the glued-down side of each card. Faintly visible on the other sides of the back-facing cards (like the one with Paille’s biography and the frantic “WRONG PLAYER” correction) is a thin blue rectangle along the top and side edges – which matches the design of the front of the cards. I tested the opacity of the File Binder page (and the slab) using all kinds of other cards including some of the bright glowing orange backs of 1988 Topps Baseball. I rested them atop the slab and held everything up to a strong light and you can’t see anything except the shadow of the shape of the card.

I would have to break the slab apart AND peel the cards off their construction paper home (yeah, I’m still thinking about it) to be certain. But I think those are issued cards glued on there. And I think Topps caught its mistakes in time to pull all – or nearly all copies of #61 Marcel Paille Oops It’s Frank Paice (and the Gamble and Mohns mistakes) before they went into the packs.

(ed. note - Here's the 1962-63 issued Hockey card showing Paice, correctly named in front view, courtesy of Keith Olbermann):

(ed. note - Here's detail from the 1962-63 aluminum proof showing Paille's biography on the reverse, courtesy of Keith Olbermann, then his actual 1962-63 reverse):


But…perhaps those were  proof sheets Topps used for the 1962 Hockey Binders and they weren’t blank-backed. Topps printed complete proof sheets – fronts, backs, bios, card numbers, cartoons – in 1959 and 1960. But all those ’62 sheets found in Connecticut were one-sided. This would require Topps to have printed only one-sided 1962 Baseball proof sheets, only one-sided 1962 Football proof sheets, and then one-sided 1962 Hockey proof sheets and  some two-sided 1962 Hockey proof sheets just…cause?

I could easily be wrong. The faint rectangles could be glue stains on blank-backed (or blank-fronted) proof cards. It makes no sense, but Topps certainly could’ve  printed two different kinds of proof sheets. This could just be my now ancient eyes playing tricks on me. This could be my 1985 brain cells and wallet crying out for vengeance. It could all be wish fulfillment.

Or, they’re unissued error cards Topps printed and destroyed.

For now I can only offer these postscripts. The next year, Topps did not make the same mistake with the hockey immortal who inadvertently set this row of dominos falling. They proudly made a 1963-64 Doug Harvey card. Whereupon Harvey skipped Rangers’ training camp, was sent down to the minors, returned to New York for fourteen listless games, and was then banished to Quebec of the American League. He didn’t return to the NHL until 1966 and then at age 43 exploded back into stardom as the ace defenseman of the first St. Louis Blues team as it advanced to the 1968 Stanley Cup final against his old team, the Canadiens. O-Pee-Chee even made him card #1 in its 1968-69 set, using an image that is either simply a horizontally flipped version of the shot from his 63-64 Rangers card, or something from the same photo shoot.

(ed. note - Here's the 1963-64 (Topps) and 1968-69 (OPC) cards of Harvey):



And as to Paille, he would finally get a real card of his own when Topps got the rights to all six teams in 1964 and celebrated with the beloved “Tallboys” set. He’s #92 in that set, what we would call today an SSP (or maybe a SSSP – especially in good condition).

(ed. note - Here's the 1964-65 Paille card):


On the other hand – I’ve triple-checked. The guy on the 1964-65 Marcel Paille card is actually and surprisingly, Marcel Paille!

(ed. note: You can catch Keith discussing the 1962 Hockey mix-ups on his May 15 (2025) podcast. It starts at 49:49.https://omny.fm/shows/countdown-with-keith-olbermann)

Saturday, May 17, 2025

Alive in '55

Last month's post about possible dating anomalies concerning the Topps Robin Hood set caught the attention of Friend o'the Archive Lonnie Cummins, who pointed out a couple of things of import on that front. First and foremost, I either need screens with better resolution or a new prescription for my glasses. Lonnie then pointed out the copyright on the one and five cent wrappers was a unique one for Topps, especially the penny version.

Here is the one cent wrapper, in case you forgot how it looked:


Double the indicia, double the fun:


I spent some time casting about for the meaning of "OFF F" but it turns out the five cent wrapper had it spelled out all along, which I couldn't quite resolve on the pack example shown last month.  Lonnie kindly sent along a wrapper image with more clarity:

Just below the five cent circle, you can see that it says "OFFICIAL FILMS":


Lonnie also passed along a five cent retail box scan, which was Canadian in origin (you can easily tell by the "36 Count" stamp).  The packs would have held four and not five cards like in the US and you can see the Official Films name at bottom right of the top flap:


Nice box!

As it turns out, Official Films were the syndicator for The Adventures of Robin Hood in the US (and possibly Canada).

There's still  dating and attribution anomalies as the October 1955 copyright for the set being at odds with the 1960 American Card Catalog entry:


All of this leads me to think the Topps Robin Hood debuted in 1955 and then, well, I dunno.  Did it sell so fantastically it lasted until 1957?  Was it reissued? But if so, where are all the one and five cent wrappers? What of the Lucky Penny insert then, eh? And why, if Woody Gelman was one of the ACC editors, is the date for a Topps set wrong?!  Was it just a typo? Then there is the notion it was based upon some undefined movie. 

I've identified six possible silver screen candidates, all of which were released after the classic 1938 Errol Flynn version, with the actor playing Robin in parentheses:
  • The Bandit of Sherwood Forest (Cornel Wilde)
  • The Prince of Thieves (Jon Hall)
  • Rogues of Sherwood Forest (John Derek)
  • Tales of Robin Hood (Robert Clarke)
  • The Story of Robin Hood and his Merrie Men (Richard Todd)
  • The Men of Sherwood Forest (Dan Taylor)
The Richard Todd vehicle was a 1952 live action Disney feature, and the The Men of Sherwood Forest was a Hammer Films production released first in the UK (seemingly in 1954) which then, maybe (hard to tell) debuted two years later in the US, so perhaps it was just a brain cramp somewhere coming up with it as the source, but none of these flicks starred Richard Greene, so it's an obvious error.

Questions, questions...but I am now considering this is a 1955 set, with confusion still about the dating in the ACC; your mileage may vary. That would make it the first standard sized set from Topps then, and not Elvis Presley more than a year later, quite surprising but the boys from Brooklyn were experimenting with various dimensions for most of their first card-issuing decade. I suspect it was conceived as a Giant Size set, hence the divisible-by-ten set count, then a decision was made to reduce the size of the cards to 2.5 x 3.5 inches for release.

Saturday, May 10, 2025

The Straight Dopey

I was looking through my 1970 Funny Doors set the other day when I noticed something well, funny.  Card number 20, "Dopey Book Shop" is festooned with eight book titles, which are being looked over by a puzzled consumer. I realized these titles sounded familiar and sure enough, Topps did something meta here, as almost all are taken from the 1967 release of Dopey Books!

Here's the door in question:


Now my set of Funny Doors is unburst so I didn't want to open the flaps up to see each gag's payoff but I do have an image of an original bit o'artwork (with partial overlay) that shows the reveals for some of them:

I showed that specific piece of artwork when I posted about the set not too long ago but it's come in handy again, so please forgive the repeat look.  As you can see, five of the gags are revealed.  Let's take a look, shall we?  From left-to-right, then top-to-bottom and using the Dopey Book numbering, we also have five that correspond to its gags:

31. What Every Girl Should Know (A Rich Bachelor!)


10. How To Take Care Of Your Teeth (Put 'Em In A Glass)


7. I Lived With Wild Beasts (My Family)


27. How To Put A Lasting Finish On Your Car (Try To Beat A Train To The Crossing)


36. I Hunted For Buffalo (But I Got Lost And Wound Up In Albany)


Another is very close:

32. Your Career In The Movies aka Dopey Books "You Can Have A Job In Movies" (As An Usher)  


Two don't match up:

See Europe On $5.00 A Day - I assume this is some kind of French Foreign Legion joke based upon the reveal behind the door.

Hypnotism - Not sure of this payoff based upon the illustration shown above.

Text has been replaced, of course, by an image for each payoff and the artwork is not the same at all given the size restrictions, but the point is made. It was pretty cool of Topps to do something like this.

Saturday, May 3, 2025

Chips Off The Ol' Blockheads or, Here Be Monsters

Hey gang, today we take a look at the very oddball Blockheads issue that makes last week's subject, Wise Ties - a product Topps appears to have pulled or curtailed due to a perceived choking hazard - look like a national safety award winner. I've taken only the briefest of glances here at the set, which is also related to 3D Monster Posters, and therein hangs a tale (of terror).

As with the Wise Ties, Blockheads is thought to have been quicky withdrawn from the marketplace as they were intended to be opened up and used as Hallowe'en masks, like so:


While undeniably cool, you can plainly see that a safety hazard was presented by Blockheads miniscule eye slits. But here's the thing, thanks to some serious detective work by Fiend o'the Archive Lonnie Cummins, it very much seems like 3D Monster Posters, long thought to have been a reissued or reconfigured re-release of Blockheads, came first in a test format, then was changed over to a mask.

I get the distinct feeling that any safety concerns were back-burnered at Topps in favor of a set's "cool factor," which to my mind could have been somewhat related to the way they lab tested things with kids.  It's not hard to envision some young tyke holding the original test issue poster to his face and saying how neat it would be if instead it was a mask. 

Lonnie's theory is based upon disappeared or changed indicia from 3-D Monster Posters compared to Blockheads, and while I love showing that stuff, I'm limited due to some low-res images but it sure seems like a solid hypothesis. Poster first, the mask:

 

You can see how the left side of the white box is blank on the mask example, as two lines of information were apparently excised from the poster, as seen at left.  Lonnie has also found some subjects where there is just a blank area on certain Blockheads that matches were indicia would or should have been. And that fuzzy word next to the "12 " on the poster example sure looks long enough to say "poster." All of this points to 3D Monster Posters being the first issue, closely followed by Blockheads.

Here now, the boxes:


3D plus three uses suggested, nice reinforcement!  The redesign added five cents to the price and added some wonderfully gruesome artwork.  What's abundantly clear is that Topps explicitly gave instructions right on the retail box for wearing the Blockheads:


This means they changed the product from being somewhat hazardous to fully hazardous ON PURPOSE! 

That top box was courtesy of Lonnie by the way, the bottom two from another Fiend o'the Archive, Terry Gomes. The box front displayed a helpful visual checklist of all twelve subjects (more on that in a sec) while the bottom indicia rocked a 1967 commodity code.

I do not have a 3D Monster Posters box bottom to show unfortunately. On a related note, longtime Topps consultant Mark Newgarden recalls finding these at what turned out to this Brooklyn test store:


He found them well after 1967, so they languished a bit until he came along.  Now, did Mark find a Blockhead or a 3D Monster Poster?  I'm guessing both were possible (Update:5/9/25: It was masks only. Full poster indicia has yet to be sighted based upon messages I've received since this was posted). He advised there were no wrappers either, they were just loose in the box.

I originally intended for this to just be a visual checklist covering both sets (the artwork itself was never altered) but realizing I had never really addressed either in full, things kind of ballooned on me.  Yet another Friend o'the Archive, Jeff Pace, sent along this shot of all twelve images.  It's got some glare, so let's regroup below:


OK, so the artwork is all stunning, and that's even before you relaize these were designed to sell for a kid's pocket change! This was where Topps was at the time though, as they knocked out one large format set after another, particularly in the 1967-69 timeframe, all of which featured amazing illustration work.

The checklist is as follows, going left-to-right, then top-to bottom:

The Hippie
The Ape
The Giant Fly
The Pirate
The Mad Scientist
The Witch Doctor
The Martian
The Three Eyed Monster
The Bleech
The Skull
The Moon Creature
The Green Monster

Some of those names may be from old checklists and might contain too many "the's"; these are tough finds and I do not have any scans of the subject names beyond The Bleech to go with indicia-wise. Here's non-glare views of  The Mad Scientist, The Three Eyed Monster, The Bleech and The Green Monster:


He seems to be the toughest one to find, at least from what I have been able to determine but it's all relative given the scarcity of these suckers.


Topps seemed to love three-eyed monsters as several have appeared in sets over the years. Pee Wee's Playhouse had an example, two in fact, twenty-two years later:





Yecch...the Bleech!


Sorry (not sorry).  Here's the real Green Monster:


I'll conclude with something I've shown before, namely the full artwork for The Witch Doctor.  It might be the best single example of artwork I've ever seen from Topps, quite close if it isn't, as it's hard to rank the really, really top ones:


These were all created for kids to essentially destroy then toss.  How monstrously crazy!